Cybersecurity services · VAPT · Pentesting
VAPT and penetration testing from Ahmedabad, run by engineers who ship production software. Every finding arrives with steps to reproduce it, its real-world impact, and a fix that compiles in your codebase — never just a scanner ID and a severity label.
Every engagement includes
Every engagement includes
Capabilities
Each mapped to the public standard it is measured against, so you can see the coverage rather than take our word for it.
Assessment and penetration testing across your applications, APIs and network. Tools give us coverage; a tester on the keyboard finds everything that requires understanding how your business actually works.
Manual testing with a goal, not a checklist. Scanners find known signatures — the findings that matter usually come from chaining three 'low severity' issues into one that ends with your data.
A structured review of how your system is built and run, mapped to a published verification standard. You get measured coverage you can point at — not one engineer's list of opinions.
We read the source, not just probe the surface. Some of the most damaging flaws — like a user being able to load another customer's records — are nearly invisible from outside and obvious the moment you read the code.
A review of your AWS, GCP or Azure setup: permissions, what is exposed to the internet, how data is stored, and the defaults nobody revisited after the first deploy went out under deadline.
Preparation for the audit or security questionnaire in front of you. We get your evidence in order and answer the technical questions. We do not issue certificates, and nobody honest will promise you a pass.
Decide who does what before it happens, rather than at 2am in a group chat. Runbooks and practice drills, built while there is still time to think clearly.
Engagement process
The rules of engagement exist so that testing never becomes a surprise. You know what we will do, when, and who to call to stop it.
We agree exactly what is in scope, what is off limits, when we test, and who to call if something goes wrong. All of it signed before anything is touched.
We map what is really exposed — endpoints, user roles, trust boundaries, third-party integrations — rather than trusting that the documentation is complete. It rarely is.
Manual testing supported by tools, against the standards we agreed. Anything critical reaches you the moment we confirm it — we do not sit on it until the report.
Findings written for your engineers and summarised for whoever signs off, ordered by what is genuinely exploitable in your deployment rather than by raw scanner severity.
We stay available while you fix things. A question about a finding goes straight to the person who found it — not into a support queue.
We verify your fixes and reissue the report showing exactly what closed and what is still open. This is included in the price, not a separate engagement.
How we rate findings
A scanner's 'critical' is often unreachable in your setup, and its 'medium' is sometimes the one that gets you. Pick a level to see what it means and how fast you would hear about it.
What it means
Exploitable right now, and it leads to system compromise or mass data exposure.
When you hear about it
Reported on discovery, same day.
Every finding is rated on this scale, and colour is never the only signal — each carries its label in text.
What you get
A security engagement should end with something your engineers can act on and something your buyers can read. Not a scanner export with a logo on it.
Written for the engineers who have to fix it — not padded to justify a page count.
Ordered by what is genuinely exploitable in your deployment, not by raw scanner output.
The part most vendors charge extra for. With us it is part of the price.
Methodology
Naming a methodology is a statement about process, not accreditation. We hold no certifications we have not earned, and we will not imply otherwise.
| Standard | Applied to |
|---|---|
| OWASP Top 10Open Worldwide Application Security Project | Web application risk baseline |
| OWASP ASVSApplication Security Verification Standard | Depth-graded verification requirements |
| OWASP MASVSMobile Application Security Verification Standard | iOS and Android applications |
| PTESPenetration Testing Execution Standard | Engagement structure and reporting |
| NIST SP 800-115Technical Guide to Information Security Testing | Assessment methodology |
| CIS BenchmarksCenter for Internet Security Benchmarks | Cloud and host hardening |
| MITRE ATT&CKAdversarial Tactics, Techniques & Common Knowledge | Threat modelling and mapping |
Compliance
We get you ready for the audit and answer the technical questions it raises. The certificate itself is issued by an accredited certification body after their own audit — not by us, and not by any testing vendor.
ISO 27001 readiness
ISO/IEC 27001 Information Security Management
Built to be auditable
Every vendor says they support compliance. These six decisions determine whether your audit is a review or a rewrite — and they get made in the first week of a build, not the last.
Every change to a sensitive record is logged with who did it, when, and what it was before. This is the first evidence an auditor asks for, and it cannot be reconstructed after the fact.
Roles and tenant separation enforced where the query runs, not in the interface. A check in the interface is only a suggestion — anything reaching the API goes straight past it.
Encrypted in transit and at rest by default, with keys held in a managed service you can rotate without redeploying the application.
Where records live and how long they are kept are settings, not assumptions buried in code. A new residency requirement or a deletion request becomes a configuration change rather than a migration.
Logins, session lifetimes and re-checks before sensitive actions built to a published standard — not to whatever the framework generated by default.
Reviewed code changes, a release history and a deployment trail. When an auditor asks who approved a change and when, the answer is already written down.
Before you ask
Mostly about risk, access, and whether we will overstate what we can do.
Tell us what you have built and who is asking questions about it. We will tell you what kind of engagement actually fits — including if it is a smaller one than you expected.
Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
